Real-world comparison of terlipressin vs. octreotide as an adjuvant treatment in the management of variceal bleeding.

Variceal bleeding is a major complication and the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of terlipressin vs octreotide as an adjuvant to endoscopic management of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding in a real-time scenario. We reviewed the medical records of patients with esophageal variceal bleeding from January 2005 to December 2020 at our tertiary care Aga Khan University Hospital. Mortality was assessed after 6 weeks. A total of 842 patients with variceal bleed were evaluated. 624 patients (74.1%) and 218 patients (25.9%) received Terlipressin and Octreotide respectively. On multiple regression analysis, cardiac events during hospital stay (OR: 11.22), presence of Porto-systemic encephalopathy (OR: 3.79), and elevated bilirubin levels at the time of presentation were found to be independent risk factors for increased six weeks mortality. Moreover, cardiac events during hospital stay (OR: 3.26), Porto-systemic encephalopathy at presentation (OR: 3.06), and octreotide administration (OR: 1.80) were identified as independent risk factors for increased length of hospital stay. Terlipressin and Octreotide have similar outcomes in terms of control of bleeding, hospital stay, mortality, and side effects when used as adjuvant therapy for the management of variceal bleeding.

Terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The definition and diagnostic criteria of hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) has undergone recent changes. A major vasoconstrictor, terlipressin, has recently been approved as pharmacotherapy for HRS-AKI in the United States. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the readers with these new diagnostic criteria of HRS-AKI, and how best to use terlipressin. RECENT FINDINGS: Terlipressin is effective either as bolus dosing or continuous infusion and can achieve reversal of HRS-AKI in approximately 40% of patients. Continuous infusion allows lower daily dose with equal efficacy and less side effects but not an approved mode of administration in the United States. Response to terlipressin in the randomized controlled trials was defined as repeat reduction of serum creatinine to less than 1.5 mg/dl. Newer studies will likely require response to treatment to be defined as a repeat serum creatinine to be less than 0.3 mg/dl from baseline. Terlipressin use is associated with ischemic side effects and potential for respiratory failure development. SUMMARY: Careful patient selection and close monitoring are necessary for its use. Response to terlipressin with HRS-AKI reversal is associated with improved outcomes with better survival and less requirement for renal replacement therapy.

Management of hepatic hydropericardium with open drainage, maximal medical therapy and terlipressin.

We present the case of a woman in her 60s with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis who developed pericardial tamponade during an admission for a haemothorax secondary to a mechanical fall. The patient developed haemodynamic compromise with a rapid decline in renal function. During an open subxiphoid drain tube insertion, a pre-existing peritoneopericardial communication was noted, with ascites in the peritoneal cavity on view. The serum ascites albumin gradient was 14 g/L. Maximal medical therapy was commenced including diuresis and albumin, with adjunctive terlipressin infusion which restored her baseline renal function and resolved the effusion. We believe this is the first case report of using open drainage, maximal medical therapy and terlipressin to successfully treat hepatic hydropericardium and its subsequent renal compromise.

TERLIPRESSIN COMBINED WITH NOREPINEPHRINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

ABSTRACT: Objective: The objective of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of the advantages and potential research directions concerning the utilization of terlipressin (TP) in combination with norepinephrine (NE) for the management of septic shock. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across five major electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ScienceDirect, and MEDLINE, using the Boolean method. The search encompassed articles published until May 22, 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of TP combined with NE in the treatment of patients with septic shock were considered for inclusion. Results: A total of seven trials met the inclusion criteria. The combination therapy of TP and NE exhibited potential benefits in the treatment of adult patients suffering from septic shock. Furthermore, the concurrent administration of TP with NE demonstrated improvements in cardiac output and central venous pressure. However, it is important to acknowledge the presence of certain risks and potential adverse events, including an elevated risk of peripheral ischemia. Conclusions: The available evidence supports the notion that early combination therapy involving NE and TP holds promise in terms of reducing the required dosage of NE, enhancing renal perfusion, and improving microcirculation in patients diagnosed with septic shock.

First Drug for Treating Hepatorenal Syndrome.

Terlipressin (Terlivaz) has been approved as the first drug to treat hepatorenal syndrome.The drug may cause serious or fatal respiratory failure. Nurses should confirm that patients have an oxygen saturation level by pulse oximetry of at least 90% in order to start therapy.

Early treatment with terlipressin in patients with hepatorenal syndrome yields improved clinical outcomes in North American studies.

Hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS-1) is a serious complication of advanced cirrhosis and a potentially reversible form of acute kidney injury that is associated with rapidly deteriorating kidney function. Liver transplantation remains the only curative treatment for decompensated cirrhosis. However, terlipressin, a vasopressin analog, successfully reverses HRS-1, and may improve patient survival while awaiting liver transplantation. Patients with higher baseline serum creatinine have a reduced response to treatment with terlipressin. These post hoc analyses examined pooled data from 352 patients with HRS-1 treated with terlipressin in 3 North American-centric, Phase III, placebo-controlled clinical studies (i.e. OT-0401, REVERSE, and CONFIRM)-across 3 serum creatinine subgroups (i.e. <3, ≥3-<5, and ≥5 mg/dL)-to further delineate their correlation with HRS reversal, renal replacement therapy-free survival, and overall survival. Serum creatinine was significantly associated with HRS reversal in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (P<0.001). The incidence of HRS reversal inversely correlated with serum creatinine subgroup (<3 mg/dL, 49.2%; ≥3-<5 mg/dL, 28.0%; ≥5 mg/dL, 9.1%). At Day 30 follow-up, renal replacement therapy-free survival was significantly higher for patients with HRS-1 in the lower serum creatinine subgroups than in the higher subgroup (<5 vs. >5 mg/dL; p=0.01). Terlipressin-treated patients with HRS-1, with a lower baseline serum creatinine level, had a higher overall survival (p<0.001) and higher transplant-free survival at Day 90 (p=0.04). Patients with HRS-1 and lower serum creatinine levels who were treated with terlipressin had higher HRS reversal and survival outcomes, highlighting the significant need to identify and treat patients with HRS-1 early when they often have lower serum creatinine levels, and likely a greater response to terlipressin.

Terlipressin use and respiratory failure in patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 1 and severe acute-on-chronic liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggested increased mortality in patients with hepatorenal syndrome type 1 (HRS1) and advanced acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). AIM: To assess mortality and respiratory failure (RF) in patients with HRS1 and ACLF treated with terlipressin. METHODS: In the CONFIRM study, we randomised 299 patients with HRS1 2:1 to terlipressin or placebo, both with albumin. At enrolment, all patients were assessed for organ failure (OF) using a validated ACLF grading system. Post hoc analyses assessed the effects of terlipressin vs. placebo on the incidence of RF and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of RF with terlipressin (n = 200) was 9.4% in patients with grades 1-2 ACLF, and 30% with grade 3 ACLF (p = 0.0002); no such difference was observed in placebo-treated patients (n = 99) (6.2% grades 1-2 vs. 0% grade 3 ACLF, p > 0.05). RF incidence between terlipressin and placebo in patients with grade 3 ACLF was significant (p = 0.01). Baseline predictors of RF with terlipressin were INR (p = 0.011), mean arterial pressure (p = 0.037), and SpO2 (p = 0.014). Prior albumin as a continuous variable was not a predictor of RF. 90-day survival between terlipressin and placebo arms was similar for grades 1-2 ACLF (55.5% and 56.6%, respectively), but lower for grade 3 ACLF (27.55% vs. 50.0%) (p = 0.122), mainly related to RF. CONCLUSION: Terlipressin should be used with caution in patients with HRS1 and grade 3 ACLF. Patients with hypoxaemia are at increased risk of RF and mortality.

Respiratory events with terlipressin and albumin in hepatorenal syndrome: A review and clinical guidance.

Hepatorenal syndrome-acute kidney injury (HRS-AKI) is a serious complication of severe liver disease with a clinically poor prognosis. Supportive care using vasoconstrictors and intravenous albumin are the current mainstays of therapy. Terlipressin is an efficacious vasoconstrictor that has been used for 2 decades as the first-line treatment for HRS-AKI in Europe and has demonstrated greater efficacy in improving renal function compared to placebo and other vasoconstrictors. One of the challenges associated with terlipressin use is monitoring and mitigating serious adverse events, specifically adverse respiratory events, which were noted in a subset of patients in the recently published CONFIRM trial, the largest randomized trial examining terlipressin use for HRS-AKI. In this article, we review terlipressin's pharmacology, hypothesize how its mechanism contributes to the risk of respiratory compromise and propose strategies that will decrease the frequency of these events by rationally selecting patients at lower risk for these events.

COST EFFECTIVENESS OF USING TERLIPRESSIN TO TREAT HEPATORENAL SYNDROME.

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the most severe form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, and it is associated with high mortality. It is usually diagnosed according to criteria defined by the International Ascites Club. Currently, the most frequently indicated pharmacological therapy for the treatment of HRS is a combination of splanchnic vasoconstrictors (terlipressin or norepinephrine) in combination with albumin. With the progressive increase in healthcare spending, it is important to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacological treatment in patients who are diagnosed with HRS. OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness assessment for the use of terlipressin in combination with albumin to treat HRS in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: Economic evaluation of cost-effectiveness based on secondary data from studies showed the efficacy of terlipressin therapy compared with norepinephrine combined with albumin or albumin alone. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and a sensitivity analysis was developed by varying the values of therapies and probabilities. The Brazilian real was the currency used in the analysis, and the results were converted to US dollars. RESULTS: After selection, eligibility, and evaluation of the quality of publications, the results demonstrated that administration of terlipressin or norepinephrine in combination with albumin in patients diagnosed with HRS type 1 was efficacious. The cost of treatment with terlipressin in combination with albumin was USD $1,644.06, administration of albumin alone was USD $912.02, and norepinephrine plus albumin was USD $2,310.78. Considering that the combination therapies demonstrated effectiveness, the incremental cost of terlipressin and norepinephrine in combination with albumin was USD $666.73, and an effectiveness of 0.570 was found for terlipressin in combination with albumin and 0.200 for norepinephrine in combination with albumin. The incremental effectiveness was 0.370, and the ICER was USD $1,801.97. Thus, the parameters of increasing cost per therapy and ICER indicated that the combined therapy of terlipressin plus albumin was cost effective compared to albumin alone or norepinephrine plus albumin in a public single-payer healthcare system. CONCLUSION: A cost-effectiveness analysis showed that terlipressin in combination with albumin when administered concomitantly to patients who were diagnosed with type 1 HRS is cost-effective compared to norepinephrine in combination with albumin administered in a controlled environment.

Vasopressin and Its Analogues: From Natural Hormones to Multitasking Peptides.

Human neurohormone vasopressin (AVP) is synthesized in overlapping regions in the hypothalamus. It is mainly known for its vasoconstricting abilities, and it is responsible for the regulation of plasma osmolality by maintaining fluid homeostasis. Over years, many attempts have been made to modify this hormone and find AVP analogues with different pharmacological profiles that could overcome its limitations. Non-peptide AVP analogues with low molecular weight presented good affinity to AVP receptors. Natural peptide counterparts, found in animals, are successfully applied as therapeutics; for instance, lypressin used in treatment of diabetes insipidus. Synthetic peptide analogues compensate for the shortcomings of AVP. Desmopressin is more resistant to proteolysis and presents mainly antidiuretic effects, while terlipressin is a long-acting AVP analogue and a drug recommended in the treatment of varicose bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Recently published results on diverse applications of AVP analogues in medicinal practice, including potential lypressin, terlipressin and ornipressin in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, are discussed.